🔗 Share this article

Tomas Anez Dos Santos was laboring in a small glade within in the Peruvian Amazon when he noticed footsteps coming closer through the thick woodland.

It dawned on him that he had been hemmed in, and froze.

“One stood, aiming using an bow and arrow,” he remembers. “Unexpectedly he detected of my presence and I started to escape.”

He found himself confronting the Mashco Piro. For a long time, Tomas—who lives in the tiny community of Nueva Oceania—had been practically a neighbour to these itinerant people, who shun engagement with strangers.

A recent report by a rights organization states there are no fewer than 196 of what it calls “remote communities” in existence in the world. The Mashco Piro is believed to be the biggest. The report says a significant portion of these tribes might be decimated in the next decade if governments don't do further actions to defend them.

It claims the most significant threats come from deforestation, extraction or operations for oil. Remote communities are exceptionally at risk to common sickness—consequently, the report notes a risk is posed by interaction with religious missionaries and social media influencers in pursuit of clicks.

Recently, the Mashco Piro have been coming to Nueva Oceania with greater frequency, according to inhabitants.

This settlement is a fishermen's hamlet of a handful of clans, sitting high on the shores of the local river in the heart of the Peruvian jungle, half a day from the closest town by boat.

This region is not designated as a safeguarded reserve for isolated tribes, and logging companies operate here.

Tomas says that, sometimes, the sound of logging machinery can be noticed around the clock, and the Mashco Piro people are observing their jungle disrupted and ruined.

In Nueva Oceania, people state they are divided. They dread the projectiles but they also have profound regard for their “kin” who live in the forest and desire to defend them.

“Permit them to live according to their traditions, we can't change their culture. That's why we maintain our distance,” states Tomas.

The people in Nueva Oceania are worried about the harm to the community's way of life, the threat of conflict and the likelihood that loggers might subject the community to diseases they have no resistance to.

While we were in the settlement, the Mashco Piro made their presence felt again. A young mother, a woman with a young girl, was in the woodland collecting produce when she noticed them.

“We detected cries, cries from individuals, a large number of them. Like there was a whole group shouting,” she informed us.

It was the first instance she had met the group and she fled. After sixty minutes, her mind was still throbbing from fear.

“Since operate timber workers and operations cutting down the woodland they are escaping, perhaps due to terror and they end up near us,” she explained. “It is unclear what their response may be to us. This is what scares me.”

Two years ago, two individuals were assaulted by the group while angling. A single person was struck by an bow to the abdomen. He lived, but the other person was located lifeless after several days with nine arrow wounds in his frame.

Authorities in Peru follows a approach of non-contact with remote tribes, making it prohibited to commence interactions with them.

The policy originated in Brazil following many years of advocacy by community representatives, who saw that first contact with secluded communities lead to entire groups being wiped out by illness, destitution and hunger.

Back in the eighties, when the Nahau tribe in Peru came into contact with the outside world, half of their people died within a matter of years. A decade later, the Muruhanua community experienced the similar destiny.

“Secluded communities are extremely susceptible—from a disease perspective, any contact may transmit diseases, and even the most common illnesses might wipe them out,” explains Issrail Aquisse from a tribal support group. “In cultural terms, any exposure or interference could be extremely detrimental to their life and well-being as a society.”

For local residents of {