🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.